Ain shams university - Egypt
27 - 05 Mar 2025
Question1: Which of the following statements correctly describes the primary structural advantage of a tied arch bridge compared to a traditional arch bridge?
Explanation: In a tied arch bridge, the deck acts as a tension tie that connects the ends of the arch, effectively containing the horizontal thrust forces that would otherwise be transferred to the foundations. This tension is carried by a dedicated tie girder typically located below the deck. The tie girder "ties" the ends of the arch together, creating a self-contained structural system where the horizontal forces are resolved within the superstructure itself. This key feature allows tied arch bridges to be built on weaker foundation conditions that would be unsuitable for traditional arch bridges, as the foundations primarily need to resist only vertical reactions rather than significant horizontal thrust forces. The structural efficiency of this system also permits more slender arch profiles and makes tied arch bridges particularly suitable for river crossings where foundation work is challenging or costly.
Question 2: A tied arch bridge has a span of 120m and a rise of 20m. The arch has a parabolic profile and carries a uniformly distributed load of 40 kN/m (including self-weight and superimposed dead load) plus a live load of 30 kN/m. Calculate the maximum axial force in the tie girder with load factors of 1.25 for dead load and 1.5 for live load.
Solution:
Explanation: In a tied arch bridge, the tie member (a structural girder typically located below the deck) resists the horizontal thrust generated by the arch. The horizontal thrust depends on the span, rise, and loading of the arch. For a uniformly loaded parabolic arch, the formula H = wL²/(8f) provides the horizontal thrust, which equals the axial tensile force in the tie. This calculation demonstrates how the geometry of the arch (particularly the rise-to-span ratio) significantly affects the forces within the structure. A smaller rise results in larger horizontal forces, highlighting the importance of optimizing the arch geometry during design. In practice, additional considerations such as temperature effects, non-uniform loading patterns, and dynamic loading would also influence the final design forces.